Evaluation Q2
Our protagonist can be compared to Tom Hank's character in 'Road to Perdition',
Michael Sullivan. Both characters are motivated by their families, lose family
members to organised crime, and change their allegiances in a fashion that
places them at odds with dark and powerful figures. The key difference
between the characters is that Sullivan spends the remainder of his film
running from his new enemies, whereas the protagonist of 'ShadowMan'
specifically goes looking for his enemies in order to exact a kind of vigilante
justice and vengeance. This character does conform to certain tropes,
especially those surrounding revenge
('Vengeance Feels Empty' [1] 'Who's Laughing Now?' [2]), there
is also a sense of remorse and self loathing within the character, conforming
to the 'Dirty Business' [3] trope. This sort of vengeful character is not really a figure
who can be used to represent any particular social groups, however his position
as a white man means that he is a privileged figure, and may suggest why he feels
such responsibility to his family, as his character would traditionally fall into the
breadwinner/protector archetypes. Our use of an older, male, main character
is also an example of targeting, as a key part of our market is the 25-30 year old males.
In terms of gender in general, the opening to 'ShadowMan' only ever has male
characters onscreen, which may be neglecting a need for female characters,
and could alienate female audiences. However, the absence of women in
the opening could be said to emphasize the loss suffered by the protagonist.
In any case, the fully male cast of our opening sequence represents
the world of crime as a male dominated enviroment, which in turn
implies that men are more predisposed towards violence, murder,
and other forms of crime. The murder of the protagonist's family
has implications that they were unable to protect themselves, and
that he was able to protect himself, which enforces his status as
a would-be archetypal breadwinner/father figure.
'There is also a clear social hierarchy evident in our film, although
this is existent in the crime world, where the two antagonists are
at different tiers of the criminal hierarchy. This is denoted by
their clothing and attitudes. There is evidence of wealth in the
second antagonist, and this can be said to be categorising
people based on income. As mentioned earlier however, the
characters in which this is seen are both in some form of
criminal organisation, which distances it from reality and
social hierarchy in the workplace or generally.' [4]
All in all, our opening sequence contains strong representations
of gender and social status. The representation of gender, although
not wholly negative, does conform to tropes and archetypes, and
thus could be accused of perpetuating stereotypes. In terms of
representation of social status, although potentially negative, due
to the categorization of characters based on income and social
standing, is fairly representative of the world of organised
crime, a world which we were not really concerned with in terms
of negatively representing it.
Below is a clip from Road to Perdition demonstrating it's plot and aesthetic similarities to our
film, 'ShadowMan', the representations of male dominance and male behaviour are
especially notable, as well as that of criminal hierarchy.
Below is a clip from Road to Perdition demonstrating it's plot and aesthetic similarities to our
film, 'ShadowMan', the representations of male dominance and male behaviour are
especially notable, as well as that of criminal hierarchy.
[1] http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/VengeanceFeelsEmpty
[2] http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/WhosLaughingNow
[3] http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DirtyBusiness
[4] Representation in 'ShadowMan' http://alleynsmedia-mead.blogspot.co.uk/2013/12/representation.html
No comments:
Post a Comment